Maximizing Research Impact in Higher Education: An Approach to Identify Essential Stakeholders and Ensure Use-Inspired Outcomes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22161/jhed.6.1.6Keywords:
organizations, research, society, stakeholders, tangible outcomes, use-inspired designAbstract
A growing consensus suggests that scientific research should be use-inspired, thereby addressing the contemporary needs of society. Various studies and perspectives from different disciplines and industries underscore stakeholder engagement as essential to facilitate that objective. A structured process is presented that includes defining goals, identifying key stakeholders, brainstorming, consulting experts, stakeholder mapping, engaging with stakeholders, and adjusting plans to reflect stakeholder feedback. Involving stakeholders early in an initiative facilitates numerous benefits, including improved decision-making, greater stakeholder buy-in, improved problem identification, tailored solutions, risk mitigation, transparency, credibility, faster implementation, and potential for innovative ideas. An example of a stakeholder identification process is provided to strengthen research proposal development. This article is for researchers, practitioners, or businesses seeking guidance to better integrate stakeholders in their work or organization. The article is also intended for professionals entering the workforce who wish to include stakeholders to ensure tangible outcomes. Effective stakeholder prioritization requires a balanced and adaptive strategy that considers environmental resource, economic, and societal factors, ensuring solutions meet critical concerns within each industry's unique ecosystem and human needs. This article provides a decision-making framework to enhance research credibility by identifying essential stakeholder perspectives, making research outcomes more effective and impactful.
Downloads
References
Pelco, L.E.; Early, J. Professional Development for Community-Engaged Research and Teaching: An Integrated Model for Administrators, Instructors, Researchers and Community Partners. In Proceedings of the 2016 Coalition of Uban and Metropolitan Universities Conference in Washington, D.C., Washington, D.C., 2016; pp. 1-18.
Rovaletti, M.L. La Investigacion Biomedica Actual: Un Cuestionamiento A La Sociedad En Su Conjunto. Acta bioethica 2003, 9, doi:10.4067/s1726-569x2003000100010.
Kilbourne, A.M.; Garrido, M.M.; Brown, A.F. Translating research into policy and action. Health Services Research 2022, 57, 5-8, doi:10.1111/1475-6773.13980.
Resnik, D.B. Scientific Autonomy and Public Oversight. Episteme 2008, 5, 220-238, doi:10.3366/e1742360008000336.
Sax, J.K. The Separation of Politics and Science. Stanford Journal of Law, Science & Policy 2013, 7, 1-22.
Fuqua, D.; Walgren, D.R. Decision-Making for Quality Science. Science, Technology & Human Values 1982, 7, 32 - 34.
Warner, J.S. "Reward Systems in Academe" (special issue). 60 National Forum 2 (Spring 1980): 3-27. Science, Technology & Human Values 1980, 5, 71 - 72.
Hubbart, J.A. Harmonizing Science and Society: A Change Management Approach to Align Scientific Endeavors with Societal Needs. Sustainability 2023, 15, 15233, doi:10.3390/su152115233.
Hubbart, J.A. Considering Use-Inspired Design and Tangible Impacts in the Agricultural Sector. Open Access Journal of Agricultural Research 2023, 8, 1-5.
Rau, H.; Goggins, G.; Fahy, F. From invisibility to impact: radically different measures are needed to capture the true impact of research. Available online: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences (accessed on October 17, 2023).
Barnosky, A.D.; Hadly, E.A. Problem solving in the Anthropocene. The Anthropocene Review 2014, 1, 76 - 77.
Sung, W.; Kim, C. A Study on the Effect of Change Management on Organizational Innovation: Focusing on the Mediating Effect of Members’ Innovative Behavior. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2079, doi:10.3390/su13042079.
Carrad, A.; Parrish, A.-M.; Yeatman, H. Building Public Health Capacity through Organizational Change in the Sport System: A Multiple-Case Study within Australian Gymnastics. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021, 18, 6726, doi:10.3390/ijerph18136726.
Rieg, N.A.; Gatersleben, B.; Christie, I. Organizational Change Management for Sustainability in Higher Education Institutions: A Systematic Quantitative Literature Review. Sustainability 2021, 13, 7299, doi:10.3390/su13137299.
Hubbart, J.A. Organizational Change: Considering Truth and Buy-In. Administrative Sciences 2023, 13, 3, doi:10.3390/admsci13010003.
Hubbart, J.A. The Coming Food Crisis: A Moment for Organizational Change at a Global Level. International Journal on Agriculture Research and Environmental Sciences 2022, 3, 3, doi:10.51626/ijares.2022.03.00022.
Stokes, D.E. Pasteur's quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation; Brookings Institution Press: 2011.
Massari, S. Transforming research and innovation for sustainability: Transdisciplinary design for future pathways in agri-food sector. 2021.
Prost, L.; Berthet, E.T.; Cerf, M.; Jeuffroy, M.H.; Labatut, J.; Meynard, J.M. Innovative design for agriculture in the move towards sustainability: scientific challenges. Research in Engineering Design 2017, 28, 119-129.
Massari, S. The challenge of transdisciplinarity: Design methods for agri-food innovation and sustainability. Transdisciplinary Case Studies on Design for Food and Sustainability 2021.
Strasser, G. Impediments to societal problem solving: What must happen before we can succeed? IEEE Spectrum 1971, 8, 43-48.
Campbell, K.S. Prioritizing research topics in professional communication. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of IPCC 97. Communication, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 25-25 October 1997, 1997; pp. 283-290.
Maruyama, M. Endogenous research vs “experts” from outside. Futures 1974, 6, 389-394.
Serra, F.A.R.; Ferreira, M.P.; Scafuto, I.C. Why is Academia Sometimes Detached from Firms’ Problems? The Unattractiveness of Research on Organizational Decline. Bar. Brazilian Administration Review 2020, 17, doi:https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2020200005
Fischer, K. The Insular World of Academic Research: More Community-Focused Scholarship Could Build Public Trust. What's Standing in the Way? The Chronicle of Higher Education September 1, 2023 2023, pp. 15-19.
Miller, J.D. Public Understanding of, and Attitudes toward, Scientific Research: What We Know and What We Need to Know. Public Understanding of Science 2004, 13, 273 - 294.
Ramos-Vielba, I.; D’Este, P.; Woolley, R.; Amara, N. Introduction to a special section: Balancing scientific and societal impact—A challenging agenda for academic research. Science and Public Policy 2018, 45, 749-751.
Uriarte, M.; Ewing, H.A.; Eviner, V.; Weathers, K.C. Constructing a Broader and More Inclusive Value System in Science. BioScience 2007, 71-78.
Sinatra, G.M.; Hofer, B.K. Public Understanding of Science. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2016, 3, 245 - 253.
Kotter, J.P. Leading Change; Harvard Business Press: Harvard Business School, Brighton, Massachusetts, 2012.
Kotter, J.P.; Schlesinger, L.A. Choosing strategies for change. Harv Bus Rev 1979, 57, 106-114.
Levy, M. Change Management Serving Knowledge Management and Organizational Development: Reflections and Review; IGI Global: IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2021; Volume Research Anthology on Digital Transformation, Organizational Change, and the Impact of Remote Work, pp. 990-1004.
Krkač, K. Stakeholder Mapping. Springer International Publishing: 2022; pp. 1-7.
Kuriashkin, V.L.; Zhukova, N.A. Data Analysis Methods for Urban Planning–Problem-Oriented Stakeholders Maps Building. In Proceedings of the The Open University, Rome, Italy, 2013.
Raju, S.S.; Sripriya, S.S. Stakeholder Mapping for Holistic Interventions. Springer Singapore: 2017; pp. 151-166.
Kettunen, J. The stakeholder map in higher education. International Proceedings of Economics Development and Research 2014, 78, 34-38.
Bousquet, J.; Leyrie, C.; Diallo, T. Towards an Iterative and Longitudinal Methodology for Analyzing Stakeholders within a Project Context. The Journal of Modern Project Management 2013, 1, 1-5.
Sherman, M.H.; Ford, J. Stakeholder engagement in adaptation interventions: an evaluation of projects in developing nations. Climate Policy 2014, 14, 417-441, doi:10.1080/14693062.2014.859501.
Franklin, A.L. Introduction to Stakeholder Engagement. In Stakeholder Engagement, Franklin, A.L., Ed.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, 2020; pp. 1-17.
Zhu, L.; Chattopadhyay, S.; Elijah Akanbi, O.; Lobo, S.; Panthi, S.; Malayil, L.; Craddock, H.A.; Allard, S.M.; Sharma, M.; Kniel, K.E.; et al. Biochar and zero-valent iron sand filtration simultaneously removes contaminants of emerging concern and Escherichia coli from wastewater effluent. Biochar 2023, 5, doi:10.1007/s42773-023-00240-y.
Fang, L.; Huang, T.; Lu, H.; Wu, X.-L.; Chen, Z.; Yang, H.; Wang, S.; Tang, Z.; Li, Z.; Hu, B.; Wang, X. Biochar-based materials in environmental pollutant elimination, H2 production and CO2 capture applications. Biochar 2023, 5, doi:10.1007/s42773-023-00237-7.
Manea, A.; Tabassum, S.; Lambert, M.; Cinantya, A.; Ossola, A.; Leishman, M.R. Biochar, but not soil microbial additives, increase the resilience of urban plant species to low water availability. Urban Ecosystems 2023, doi:10.1007/s11252-023-01382-4.
Licklider, M.M.; Network, T.U.M.G.W. Grant Seeking in Higher Education: Strategies and Tools for College Faculty; Wiley Publishers: 2012; p. 336.
Dable-Tupas, G.; Toralba-Lupase, V.; Puyana, J.C.; Găman, M.-A. Research Grant Proposal Writing Course for Students in Higher Institutions. International Journal of Medical Students 2022, 10, 226-232, doi:10.5195/ijms.2022.1671.
Shuman, K.M. Grant Proposal Preparation Readiness: A Glimpse at the Education Level of Higher Education Faculty. Journal of Research Administration 2019, 50, 89-107.
Kivunja, C. How to Write an Effective Research Proposal for Higher Degree Research in Higher Education: Lessons from Practice. International Journal of Higher Education 2016, 5, 163-172.
Park, J.-H.; Yun, J.-J.; Kim, S.-H.; Park, J.-H.; Acharya, B.S.; Cho, J.-S.; Kang, S.-W. Biochar improves soil properties and corn productivity under drought conditions in South Korea. Biochar 2023, 5, doi:10.1007/s42773-023-00267-1.
Pathy, A.; Ray, J.; Paramasivan, B. Biochar amendments and its impact on soil biota for sustainable agriculture. Biochar 2020, 2, 287-305, doi:10.1007/s42773-020-00063-1.
Gopal, M.; Gupta, A.; Shahul Hameed, K.; Sathyaseelan, N.; Khadeejath Rajeela, T.H.; Thomas, G.V. Biochars produced from coconut palm biomass residues can aid regenerative agriculture by improving soil properties and plant yield in humid tropics. Biochar 2020, 2, 211-226, doi:10.1007/s42773-020-00043-5.
Shafique, K.; Gabriel, C.-A. Vulnerable Stakeholders’ Engagement: Advancing Stakeholder Theory with New Attribute and Salience Framework. Sustainability 2022, 14, 11765, doi:10.3390/su141811765.
Balest, J.; Pezzutto, S.; Giacovelli, G.; Wilczynski, E. Engaging Stakeholders for Designing a FAIR Energy Data Management Tool: The Horizon 2020 EnerMaps Project. Sustainability 2022, 14, 11392, doi:10.3390/su141811392.
Massat, R. Empowering Research Participants. Affilia 1997, 12, 33 - 56.
Attree, P.; French, B.; Milton, B.; Povall, S.; Whitehead, M.; Popay, J. The experience of community engagement for individuals: a rapid review of evidence. Health & Social Care in the Community 2011, 19, 250-260, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2524.2010.00976.x.
Ingram, J.; Gaskell, P.; Mills, J.; Dwyer, J. How do we enact co-innovation with stakeholders in agricultural research projects? Managing the complex interplay between contextual and facilitation processes. Journal of Rural Studies 2020, 78, 65-77, doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.06.003.
Rodriguez‐Melo, A.; Mansouri, S.A. Stakeholder Engagement: Defining Strategic Advantage for Sustainable Construction. Business Strategy and the Environment 2011, 20, 539-552, doi:10.1002/bse.715.
Delmas, M. Stakeholders and Competitive Advantage: The Case of ISO 14001. Production and Operations Management 2001, 10, 343-358, doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2001.tb00379.x.
Schniederjans, D.G.; Khalajhedayati, M. Competitive sustainability and stakeholder engagement: Exploring awareness, motivation, and capability. Business Strategy and the Environment 2021, 30, 808-824, doi:10.1002/bse.2655.
Min Foo, L. Stakeholder engagement in emerging economies: considering the strategic benefits of stakeholder management in a cross‐cultural and geopolitical context. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society 2007, 7, 379-387, doi:10.1108/14720700710820461.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
