The Crucial Role of Evidence and Witness Testimony in International Criminal Court War Crimes Prosecutions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22161/jhed.7.2.5Abstract
This paper delves into the pivotal role of evidence and witness testimony in the prosecution of war crimes by the International Criminal Court (ICC). The International Criminal Court, tasked with addressing the most severe crimes of international concern, relies heavily on solid evidence and credible witness testimonies to secure convictions. This study scrutinizes the processes and challenges involved in collecting and presenting evidence, as well as the importance of witness protection and support mechanisms. Through an in-depth analysis of past International Criminal Court cases, the paper underscores the impact of evidence and witness testimony on the outcomes of war crimes prosecutions. The findings highlight the necessity for stringent evidentiary standards and effective witness management to ensure justice and accountability in international criminal law. This research contributes to a broader understanding of the complexities and significance of evidence and witness testimony in the pursuit of justice for war crimes.
Downloads
References
Halpern, M. (2018). Trends in Admissibility of Hearsay Evidence in War Crime Trials: Is Fairness Really Preserved? Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law, 29(1), pp. 103-126.
International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). (2008). How is the Term "Armed Conflict" Defined in International Humanitarian Law?
United Nations. (2001). Armed conflicts and their consequences. United Nations.
Al Jazeera. (2024). Mozambique president-elect urges ‘unity’ amid unrest, citizens fleeing. Al Jazeera.
African Charter on Human and Peoples‟ Rights (ACHPR) Adopted 27 June 1981, entered into force 21 October 1986, OAU Doc. CAB/LEG/67/3 REV. S, 21 ILM, (1982) 58.
M Hailbronner ‘Laws in conflict: The relationship between human rights and international humanitarian law under the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights’ (2016) 16 African Human Rights Law Journal 339-364 http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1996-2096/2016/v16n2a2.
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), 2011. International Legal Protection of Human Rights in Armed Conflict.
Human Rights Council. (2008). Protection of the human rights of civilians in armed conflict. RightDocs.
United Nations. (2022). Delegates in General Assembly Support Human Rights Council’s Monitoring of Crises Worldwide, Yet Some Say Double Standards Ignore Impact on Developing Countries. United Nations Press.
Common Article 3 of Geneva Conventions, 1949 in the Era of International Criminal Tribunals. 1949.
International Committee of the Red Cross. (2020). Commentary of 2020 Article 3 - Conflicts not of an international character. Geneva Convention (III) on Prisoners of War.
International Committee of the Red Cross. (1949). Article 3 - Conflicts not of an international character. Geneva Convention (III) on Prisoners of War.
Pejic, J. (2011). The protective scope of Common Article 3: more than meets the eye. International Review of the Red Cross, 93(881), pp. 189-225.
International Law Editorial. (2024). The Role of Evidence in International Law: A Crucial Component. World Jurisprudence.
Gandžalová, D. (2024). The importance of taking evidence as part of the court proceedings. Legestic, 2, pp. 7-15.
LawTeacher. (2019). Rules of Evidence Before the International Court of Justice. LawTeacher.net.
Ahmad, N. (2022). Types of Evidence and How They Are Used in Investigations. Legal Inquirer.
Torres, R. (2016). Testimonial Evidence. Scribd.
LegalBrief AI. (2024). Documentary Evidence - Meaning in Law and Legal Documents, Examples and FAQs. LegalBrief AI.
Neel, A., 2024. Digital Evidence: Collection, Preservation and Forensic Analysis. Legal Bites.
Additional Protocol to the Geneva Convention of 12 August 1949, and Relative to the Protection of Victims of Non- International Armed Conflicts (PROTOCOL II). 1977.
International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), 2007. International humanitarian law.
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), 1949. Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949.
Nkashe, M.S., 2015. Title of the dissertation. Unpublished dissertation. University of South Africa
Southern Africa Litigation Centre (SALC), 2020. Policy Brief: ICC Witness Protection Programme.
International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals (IRMCT), 2019. Practice Direction - Provision of Support to Victims and Witnesses (MICT-40).
International Criminal Court (ICC), 2008. Prosecutor v. Katanga. Available at: https://worldcourts.com/icc/eng/decisions/2008.07.11_Prosecutor_v_Katanga.pdf
Coalition for the International Criminal Court (CICC), 2015. Enough is Enough: Protect ICC Witnesses.
International Criminal Court (ICC), 2019. Rules of Procedure and Evidence.
International Criminal Court, 2025. The Registry. International Criminal Court.
International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, 2025. Rules of Procedure and Evidence. International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals.
International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, 2005. Decision on Prosecution Motion for Protective Measures for Witnesses. International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia.
Ewald, U., 2002. The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia and the Crime of Genocide. Max Planck Institute for Foreign and International Criminal Law.
International Committee of the Red Cross, 1998. Article 67 - Rights of the accused. Statute of the International Criminal Court.
International Committee of the Red Cross, 1998. Article 68 - Protection of the victims and witnesses and their participation in the proceedings. Statute of the International Criminal Court.
International Law Editorial, 2024. Limitations of International Criminal Law: An In-Depth Analysis. World Jurisprudence.
Ren, R., 2024. THE DICHOTOMY BETWEEN JURISDICTION AND ADMISSIBILITY IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 2024;73(2):417-446. doi:10.1017/S0020589324000022.
Thomas, D. A., Edge, Ian David, Clarke,. Donald C., Bernard,. Thomas J. and Allott,. Antony Nicolas (2024, December 16). crime. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/crime-law
International Law Editorial, 2024. The Role of Evidence in International Law: A Crucial Component. World Jurisprudence.
McDermott, Y., 2013. The Admissibility and Weight of Written Witness Testimony in International Criminal Law: A Socio-Legal Analysis. Leiden Journal of International Law, 26(4).
ICTY, 2008. Statements under Rule 92 bis ICTY. ICTR/ICTY/IRMCT Case Law Database. https://cld.irmct.org/notions/show/914/statements-under-rule-92-bis-icty
Prosecutor v. Kallon, Decision on the Defence application for leave to appeal 'decision on the prosecution's motion for immediate protective measures for witnesses and victims and for non-public disclosure.', SCSL-03-07-PT-148 (SCSL TC I, Dec. 10, 2003).
Boost, C.M.H., 2023. The Legitimacy of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR). Contemporary International Criminal Law Issues.
ICTY, 2003. Kosovo, Croatia and Bosnia, Prosecutor v. Milosevic, Decision on Prosecution Motion for the Admission of Evidence-In-Chief of Its Witnesses in Writing, IT-02-54 (ICTY TC, Apr. 16, 2003).
SCSL, 2008. Prosecutor v. Taylor, Decision on Prosecution Notice under Rule 92Bis for the Admission of Evidence Related to Inter Alia Kenema District and on Prosecution Notice under Rule 92Bis for the Admission of the Prior Testimony of TF1-036 into Evidence, SCSL-03-01-T-556 (SCSL TCII, Jul. 15, 2008).
Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada, 2021. Weighing Evidence - Chapter 5: Viva Voce evidence.
Theophilopoulos, C. and Bellengère, A., 2022. Relevance, Admissibility and Probative Value in a Rational System of Evidence: A South African Perspective. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 25.
Oliver, 2024. Witness Testimony: Credibility and Challenging Witness Statements. Law Defence.
United Nations, 1998. Some Questions and Answers. United Nations Department of Public Information.
Jayawardane, S. and Divin, C., 2014. The Gotovina, Perišić and Šainović Appeal Judgments: Implications for International Criminal Justice Mechanisms.
FasterCapital, 2024. The Broad Evidence Rule: Shedding Light on the Admissibility of Evidence. https://fastercapital.com/content/The-Broad-Evidence-Rule--Shedding-Light-on-the-Admissibility-of-Evidence.html.
International Justice Resource Center, 2014. With Đorđević Appeals Judgment, ICTY Concludes Final Case Concerning Kosovo. https://ijrcenter.org/2014/01/29/icty-concludes-final-case-concerning-kosovo/.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
