Effectiveness of Multiple Representation (MR) in Removing Misconceptions Related to Acid-base Titration

Authors

  • Karma Karma Author
  • Melam Dorji Author
  • Karma Tshering Author
  • Norzang Wangchuk Wangchuk Author
  • Krishna P Dungyel Author
  • Pema Wangdi Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22161/jhed.5.6.11

Abstract

The study aimed to investigate misconceptions related to acid-base titration among grade eleven students and evaluate the effectiveness of Multiple Representation (MR) in addressing these misconceptions. A quasi-experimental design was used, and data were collected from 30 grade eleven students using a multiple-choice diagnostic test with open-ended reasoning questions. The diagnostic test was administered before the implementation of MR to identify areas of misconceptions. Misconceptions were identified by combining two developed instruments: the multiple-choice test and the Certainty of Response Index (CRI) scale technique. The MR intervention strategy utilized verbal, visual, and digital representations while teaching acid-base titration. A post-test was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of MR. Descriptive analysis was employed, including measures such as mean, standard deviation, and percentiles. Inferential analysis included statistical tests such as paired sample t-tests and Cohen's d-effect size. Results from the misconception diagnostic tests revealed that 15.3% of the students had misconceptions about acid-base titration. Both descriptive analysis (MD = 11.67) and inferential analysis (p < 0.05, d = 1.16) indicated that MR was effective in removing misconceptions and enhancing academic achievement in grade eleven chemistry. Based on the findings, the researcher recommends that teachers adopt the MR strategy while teaching chemistry. The use of multiple representations, including verbal, visual, and digital elements, can help address misconceptions and improve academic achievement in the context of acid-base titration. Implementing MR in the classroom can provide students with a more comprehensive and engaging learning experience, enabling them to better understand and apply key concepts in chemistry.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aggul, F., Yalcin, M., Acikyildiz, M., & Sonmez, E. (2008). Investigation of Effectiveness of Demonstration-Simulation-Based Instruction in Teaching Energy Conservation at 7th Grade. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 7(2).

Ahumada Forigua, D. A., & Meija, J. (2019). The solution to titration endpoint challenges.

Aksela, Maija., & Yliopistopaino). (2005). Supporting meaningful chemistry learning and higher-order thinking through computer-assisted inquiry: a design research approach. [Maija Aksela].

Ayimbila, E. A., & Pappoe, A. N. M. (2021). Evaluating the effectiveness of demonstration-cum-discussion teaching strategy on students’ academic achievement in some ecological concepts. European Journal of Open Education and E-learning Studies, 6(2).

Beal, M. D., Kinnear, J., Anderson, C. R., Martin, T. D., Wamboldt, R., & Hooper, L. (2017). The effectiveness of medical simulation in teaching medical students critical care medicine: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Simulation in Healthcare, 12(2), 104-116.

Bosco Bharathy, J. (2015). Importance of Computer-Assisted Teaching & Learning Methods for Chemistry. Science Journal of Education, 3(4), 11. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.s.2015030401.13

Canpolat,N.(2006). Turkish Undergraguages’ Misconceptions of Evaporation, Evaporation Rate and Vapour Pressure. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 1757-1770.

Cohen,L., Manon, L., & Morrison, K.(2007). Research methods in education (6th Ed). Taylor and Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2007.00388_4.x

Crouch, S. R., Holler, F. J., Brazil, A. •, Japan, •, Korea, •, Mexico, •, Skoog, D. A., & West, D. M. (2013). Student Solutions Manual Fundamentals of Analytical Chemistry NINTH EDITION.

Daluba, N. E. (2013). Effect of Demonstration Method of Teaching on Students' Achievement in Agricultural Science. World Journal of Education, 3(6), 1-7.

D’souza, M. S., Venkatesaperumal, R., Chavez, F., Parahoo, K., & Jacob, D. (2017). Effectiveness of simulation among undergraduate students in critical care nursing. International Archives of Nursing and Health Care, 3(4), 1-8.

Forigua, D. A. A., & Meija, J. (2019). Titration endpoint challenge. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 411(1), 1.

Hand, B., & Choi, A. (2010). Examining the impact of student use of multiple modal representations in constructing arguments in organic chemistry laboratory classes. Research in Science Education, 40(1), 29-44.

İsmailoğlu, E. G., Orkun, N., Eşer, İ., & Zaybak, A. (2020). Comparison of the effectiveness of the virtual simulator and video-assisted teaching on intravenous catheter insertion skills and self-confidence: a quasi-experimental study. Nurse Education Today, 95, 104596.

Kurnaz, M. A., & Arslan, A. S. (2014). Effectiveness of Multiple Representations for Learning Energy Concepts: Case of Turkey. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 627–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.269

McDermott, M. A., & Hand, B. (2013). The impact of embedding multiple modes of representation within writing tasks on high school students’ chemistry understanding. Instructional Science, 41(1), 217-246.

Pabuccu, A.and Geban, O., (2006), Remediating Misconceptions Concerning Chemical Bonding through Conceptual Change Text, Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 30,184-192.

Pinarbasi, T. (2007). Turkish undergraduate students' misconceptions about acids and BASES. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 6(1).

Plass, J. L., Milne, C., Homer, B. D., Schwartz, R. N., Hayward, E. O., Jordan, T., ... & Barrientos, J. (2012). Investigating the effectiveness of computer simulations for chemistry learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(3), 394-419.

Prudchenko, K. (2017, October 25). The Uses of Volumetric Analysis. Retrieved from Sciencing: https://sciencing.com/use-titration-5855864.html.

Rahayu, S., Chandrasegaran, A. L., Treagust, D. F., Kita, M., & Ibnu, S. (2011). Understanding acid-base concepts: Evaluating the efficacy of a senior high school student-centered instructional program in Indonesia. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(6), 1439-1458.

Ramachandran, R., Sparck, E. M., & Levis-Fitzgerald, M. (2019). Investigating the effectiveness of using application-based science education videos in a general chemistry lecture course. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(3), 479-485.

Sheppard, K. (2006). High school students’ understanding of titrations and related acid-base phenomena. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7(1), 32–45. https://doi.org/10.1039/B5RP90014J

Sinta, T., & Pikoli, M. (n.d.). International Journal of Active Learning Using Guided Inquiry Learning with Multiple Representations to Reduce Misconceptions of Chemistry Teacher Candidates on Acid-Base Concept. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/ijal

Siswaningsih, W., Nahadi, & Chandratika, V. (2020). Profile of Misconception in Senior High School Students on the Concept of Acid-Base Strength. Proceedings of the 7th Mathematics, Science, and Computer Science Education International Seminar, MSCEIS 2019. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.12-10-2019.2296380

Üce, M., & Ceyhan, İ. (2019). The misconception in Chemistry Education and Practices to Eliminate Them: Literature Analysis. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 7(3), 202. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v7i3.3990

Widarti, H. R., Permanasari, A., & Mulyani, S. (2017a). Undergraduate students’ misconception on acid-base and argentometric titrations: a challenge to implement multiple representation learning models with cognitive dissonance strategy. International Journal of Education, 9(2), 105. https://doi.org/10.17509/ije.v9i2.5464

Widarti, H. R., Permanasari, A., & Mulyani, S. (2017b). Students’ Misconceptions on Titration. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 812(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/812/1/012016

Widarti, H. R., Permanasari, A., Mulyani, S., Rokhim, D. A., & Habiddin. (2021). Multiple Representation-Based Learning through Cognitive Dissonance Strategy to Reduce Student’s Misconceptions in Volumetric Analysis. TEM Journal, 10(3), 1263–1273. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM103-33

Downloads

Published

2023-12-09

How to Cite

Karma, K., Dorji, M., Tshering, K., Wangchuk, N. W., Dungyel, K. P., & Wangdi, P. (2023). Effectiveness of Multiple Representation (MR) in Removing Misconceptions Related to Acid-base Titration. International Journal of Humanities and Education Development (IJHED), 5(6), 83-89. https://doi.org/10.22161/jhed.5.6.11