Consumers’ Perceived quality of Restaurants in Nueva Ecija
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22161/Abstract
Some determinants of customer satisfaction are the physical environment and the interactional quality of restaurants. This paper assessed the quality of restaurants in terms of physical environment quality, interactional quality and outcome quality of restaurants. A total of 29 restaurants (18 fast food restaurants and 11 fine dining restaurants) were surveyed used an adapted questionnaire with likert-scale responses. In lieu of the foregoing discussions, the researcher had drawn three conclusions. First, restaurants provide physical environment quality in terms of ambient condition, spatial layout, and seating comfort. It is implied that customers were considering the physical conditions of a restaurant in its provision of comfort to customers. Hence, it is recommended to regulate the temperature inside the restaurant and review the signage boards to avoid confusion of customers. Second, restaurants provide interactional quality in terms of assurance, empathy, reliability and responsiveness. It is implied that customers were observant to the servers of the restaurant which yields customer satisfaction. Hence, it is recommended that restaurants should improve the speed of service to raise its interactional quality. Third, restaurants provide outcome quality in their menu and served foods. It is implied that customers seek for variety in the menu and quality food to ease their cravings. Hence, it is recommended that restaurants should add variety of foods so customers will have more options to choose from.
Downloads
References
Bose, M. (2015). A study on customer preference and satisfaction towards restaurants in Salem City. Retrieved from: http://hdl.handle.net/10603/132658
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2002). Research methods in education. routledge.
Iglesias, M. P., & Guillén, M. J. Y. (2004). Perceived quality and price: their impact on the satisfaction of restaurant customers. International Journal of Contemporary hospitality management.
Lee, S. C., Li, W. M., & Chan, L. Y. (2001). Indoor air quality at restaurants with different styles of cooking in metropolitan Hong Kong. Science of the Total Environment, 279(1-3), 181-193.
Namin, A. (2017). Revisiting customers' perception of service quality in fast food restaurants. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 34, 70-81.
Omar, M. S., Ariffin, H. F., & Ahmad, R. (2016). Service quality, customers’ satisfaction and the moderating effects of gender: A study of Arabic restaurants. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 224, 384-392.
Qin, H., & Prybutok, V. R. (2009). Service quality, customer satisfaction, and behavioral intentions in fast‐food restaurants. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences.
Ryu, K., & Han, H. (2010). Influence of the quality of food, service, and physical environment on customer satisfaction and behavioral intention in quick-casual restaurants: Moderating role of perceived price. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 34(3), 310-329.
Santos, K. E. S. (2020). Online Marketing: Benefits and Difficulties to online Business Sellers. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science, 7(3).
Souki, G. Q., Antonialli, L. M., da Silveira Barbosa, Á. A., & Oliveira, A. S. (2019). Impacts of the perceived quality by consumers’ of à la carte restaurants on their attitudes and behavioural intentions. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics.
Vagias, W. M. (2006). Likert-type scale response anchors. clemson international institute for tourism. & Research Development, Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism Management, Clemson University.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.