Integration of Digital Technology in Academics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22161/jhed.3.2.7Abstract
The report aims to identify level of technological integration in academics. Digital literacy enhances learning and knowledge of learners. The benefits of digital literacy are evident in the students’ progress. Active learning is obtained through digital technology as well as literacy enhancement. Considering these benefits, an analysis of technology integration is conducted.
The analysis reveals that desired level of technology integration is not achieved in academics. There are several barriers of poor technology integration. Poor technological infrastructure, budget deficit and poor access to technological resources are identified. Lack of time to devote learning of technological competencies is also reported by the analysis. Lack of resources, limited access, insufficient knowledge and skills of teachers and support staffs, lack of support from administrative and teachers, as well as other factors are found responsible for poor technological integration in academics. Institutional barriers are also identified as barriers such as poor leadership or structure of academic institutions. Leader’s inability to understand relevance of technology for learning is a major hindrance. In assessment, teachers do not have sufficient time to implement technology thus they do not use the technological aspects fruitfully. Lack of professional development of the teachers is also a barrier. Many teachers and supportive staff want to maintain the status quo and do not feel that technology integration is required. Such attitudes also prevent technology integration in the academic institutions.
Thus, several recommendations are provided by the report such as providing professional development opportunities to the teachers, creating a shared vision, involving stakeholdes, findings cheaper alternatives for digital tools use, seeking grants and funds from government and private organizations, addressing resistance to change by providing training regarding benefits of technology adaption in the classroom etc. the recommendations also include rotating classes and students in groups for collaborative learning, appointing students helpers, allotting more times to the teachers for technological competencies, arranging regular meetings for technology integration, addressing issues of lack of resources, etc. These recommendations can help the academic institutions to integrate technology well in academics
Downloads
References
AASL standards for 21st century learners. 2010. <http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/aasl/guidelinesandstandards/learningstandards/standards.cfm.>.
Archer, Karin, et al. “Examining the effectiveness of technology use in classrooms: A tertiary meta-analysis.” Computers & Education 78 (2014): 140-149.
Asensio-Pérez, J. I., Dimitriadis, Y., Pozzi, F., Hernández-Leo, D., Prieto, L. P., Persico, D., & Villagrá-Sobrino, S. L. “Towards teaching as design: Exploring the interplay between full-lifecycle learning design tooling and teacher professional .” (2017).
Barriers to Technology Integration for Teaching and Learning. 2021. <https://online.tarleton.edu/Home_files/EDTC_538/Week_2/Week_24.html>.
Becker, H. J. “Findings from the teaching, learning, and computing survey. .” Education policy analysis archives, 8 (2000): 51.
Bichelmeyer, Barbara, and Michael Molenda. “Issues and trends in instructional technology: Gradual growth atop tectonic shifts.” Educational media and technology yearbook 31 (2006): 3-32.
Cuban, Larry, Heather Kirkpatrick, and Craig Peck. “High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox.” American educational research journal 38.4 (2001): 813-834.
Cunningham, Jeremy, and Lisa Gonzalez. “Collaboration: The library media center and educational technology.” Teacher Librarian 36.5 (2009): 33.
Devolder, A., Vanderlinde, R., Van Braak, J., & Tondeur, J. “Identifying multiple roles of ICT coordinators.” Computers & Education, 55(4) (2010): 1651-1655.
Eisner, E. Cognition and curriculum reconsidered. New York: Teachers College Press, 1994.
Ertmer, P. A. “Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration?.” Educational technology research and development, 53(4) (2005): 25-39.
Ertmer, Peggy A., et al. “Examining teachers’ beliefs about the role of technology in the elementary classroom.” Journal of research on Computing in Education 32.1 (1999): 54-72.
Fishman, Barry J., and Nichole Pinkard. “Bringing urban schools into the information age: Planning for technology vs. technology planning.” Journal of Educational Computing Research 25.1 (2001): 63-80.
Grant, Michael M., et al. “Riverdale Elementary.” Center for Research in Education Policy and Education Innovations (2004).
Harwood, P. & Asal, V. Educating the first digital generation. Westport, CT: Praeger, 2008.
Hess, Sara A. “Digital media and student learning: Impact of electronic books on motivation and achievement.” New England Reading Association Journal 49.2 (2014): 35.
Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. “ Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research.” Educational technology research and development 55.3 (2007): 223-252.
Higgins, Steven, ZhiMin Xiao, and Maria Katsipataki. “The Impact of Digital Technology on Learning: A Summary for the Education Endowment Foundation. Full Report.” Education Endowment Foundation (2012).
Illinois Common State Standards. 2010. <http://www.isbe.state.il.us/ADP/default.htm.>.
Jewitt, Carey, Wilma Clark, and Christina Hadjithoma-Garstka. “The use of learning platforms to organise learning in English primary and secondary schools.” Learning, Media and Technology 36.4 (2011): 335-348.
Liao, Yuen-kuang Cliff, Huei-wen Chang, and Yu-wen Chen. “Effects of Computer Application on Elementary Schook Student's Achievement: A Meta-Analysis of Students in Taiwan.” Computers in the Schools 24.3-4 (2008): 43-64.
Lowther, Deborah L., Steven M. Ross, and Gary M. Morrison. “When each one has one: The influences on teaching strategies and student achievement of using laptops in the classroom.” Educational technology research and development 51.3 (2003): 23-44.
Nagel, D. 6 Technology Challenges Facing Education. <https://thejournal.com/articles/2013/06/04/6-technology-challenges-facing-education.aspx>.
Phelps, Renata, Anne Graham, and Tony Watts. “Acknowledging the complexity and diversity of historical and cultural ICT professional learning practices in schools.” Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education 39.1 (2011): 47-63.
Rafi, Muhammad, Zheng JianMing, and Khurshid Ahmad. “Technology integration for students’ information and digital literacy education in academic libraries.” Information Discovery and Delivery (2019).
Reed, Phil, Antony Hughes, and Gordon Phillips. “Rapid recovery in sub‐optimal readers in W ales through a self‐paced computer‐based reading programme.” British Journal of Special Education 40.4 (2013): 162-166.
Røkenes, F. M., & Krumsvik, R. J. “Development of student teachers’ digital competence in teacher education-A literature review. .” Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 9(04) (2014): 250-280.
Schleicher, Andreas. “The impact of COVID-19 on education insights from education at a glance 2020." Retrieved from oecd. org website: https://www. oecd. org/education/the-impact-of-covid-19-on-education-insights-education-at-a-glance-2020.” (2020).
Shaunessy, Elizabeth. “Assessing and Addressing: Teachers' Attitudes toward Information Technology in the Gifted Classroom.” Gifted Child Today 28.3 (2005): 45-53.
Silvan-Kachala, J., and E. Bialo. “Research report on the effectiveness of technology in schools.” Washington, DC: Software and Information Industry Association (2000).
Spires, Hiller A., et al. “Having our say: Middle grade student perspectives on school, technologies, and academic engagement.” Journal of research on Technology in Education 40.4 (2008): 497-515.
U.S. Department of Education. Use of Technology in Teaching and Learning. 2021. <https://www.ed.gov/oii-news/use-technology-teaching-and-learning>.
Zhao, Yong, et al. “Conditions for classroom technology innovations.” Teachers college record 104.3 (2002): 482-515.
Zheng, Binbin, et al. “Laptop use, interactive science software, and science learning among at-risk students.” Journal of science education and technology 23.4 (2014): 591-603.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
